midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
500 B.R. 214
Bankr. N.D. Ga.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Creditor (Adcock) obtained a $2,300 judgment against Debtor (Andrews) in Georgia magistrate court on Feb 5, 2013 but did not record it or obtain writ of fieri facias before the debtor filed Chapter 7 on Feb 25, 2013.
  • Debtor owns Cobb County real property worth $124,000 subject to a $100,000 deed to secure debt; scheduled equity ~ $24,000 and Debtor claimed a $2,600 exemption in that property.
  • Chapter 7 Trustee filed a Report of No Distribution and did not administer or sell the real property; Debtor received a Chapter 7 discharge.
  • Debtor moved to avoid the judgment lien under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f); debtor sought broader declaratory relief that the unrecorded judgment created no enforceable lien against the real property because it was unrecorded at filing.
  • Court framed controlling question as whether, under Georgia law, an unrecorded judgment creates an in rem interest that survives Chapter 7 when the trustee does not administer the property.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether an unrecorded Georgia judgment created an enforceable lien on debtor's real property at filing Debtor: unrecorded judgment "does not in any way affect or become a lien" on real property until recorded (O.C.G.A. § 9-12-86(b)), so no lien existed at filing Creditor: judgment binds debtor's property from date of rendition under O.C.G.A. § 9-12-80; recordation only perfects against third parties Court: judgment creates an in rem right at rendition that survives bankruptcy; recordation only perfects against third parties, so creditor has enforceable lien rights on the real property
Whether debtor can avoid the lien under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f) as impairing exemptions Debtor: seeks avoidance under § 522(f) and argues lien ineffective due to lack of recordation Creditor: lien exists and does not impair the debtor's exemption in the real property Court: § 522(f) avoidance allowed for other assets, but not for this real property because lien does not impair the exemption; thus § 522(f) does not permit avoidance here
Whether trustee's inaction converts trustee's § 544(a)(3) hypothetical bona fide purchaser rights to debtor under §§ 522(g)/(h) Debtor: could invoke trustee's hypothetical rights to avoid lien if property were exempted Creditor: debtor did not (and could not) exempt sufficient equity to use trustee avoidance powers Court: debtor cannot use §§ 522(g)/(h) because he did not (and could not) exempt the property sufficiently
Effect of bankruptcy on creditor's personal liability vs. in rem lien Debtor: discharge eliminates enforcement of judgment as personal liability Creditor: acknowledges discharge but asserts lien survives as in rem interest Court: discharge bars in personam enforcement, but lien (in rem property interest) survives and is enforceable against the real property

Key Cases Cited

  • National Bank of Ga. v. Morris-Weathers Co., 248 Ga. 798 (Ga. 1982) (recordation protects good-faith third parties; unrecorded judgment is dormant but exists and becomes effective on recordation)
  • In re Tinsley, 421 F. Supp. 1007 (M.D. Ga. 1976) (earlier federal decision holding recordation statute controlled; discussed and distinguished)
  • Long v. Bullard, 117 U.S. 617 (U.S. 1886) (lien passes through bankruptcy unaffected unless avoided)
  • Universal Am. Mortg. Co. v. Bateman (In re Bateman), 331 F.3d 821 (11th Cir. 2003) (bankruptcy principle that liens survive unless avoided)
  • Watkins v. Citizens & S. Nat’l Bank, 163 Ga. App. 468 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982) (absence of recordation does not eliminate existence or effect of judgment as between creditor and debtor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Andrews v. Adcock (In re Andrews)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
Date Published: Sep 17, 2013
Citations: 500 B.R. 214; 2013 WL 5273865; No. 13-40491
Docket Number: No. 13-40491
Court Abbreviation: Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Log In
    Andrews v. Adcock (In re Andrews), 500 B.R. 214