History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. State
2011 Ark. 461
Ark.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Anderson was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.
  • The State's proof included Dr. Craig's autopsy findings of 27 stab wounds and a fatal gunshot wound to Jill's head.
  • The circuit court admitted evidence that Jill was pregnant as motive for murder.
  • The State introduced State's Exhibits 9-16, crime-scene photographs taken 8–9 hours after death.
  • Anderson challenged a causation instruction (AMI Crim.2d 603) claiming improper burden-shifting.
  • The court denied suppression of custodial statements made before Miranda warnings, finding most statements voluntary and spontaneous.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Causation sufficiency for capital murder Anderson's stabbing plus officer gunfire could not suffice State failed to prove death caused by defendant's conduct Directed verdict denied; substantial evidence supports causation
Causation instruction burden shifting Instruction shifted burden to Anderson Instruction misapplied; preserved error Argument not preserved; plain-error doctrine not applied; burden-shifting issue not addressed on merits
Admission of pregnancy evidence Pregnancy irrelevant and prejudicial Pregnancy shows motive and intent Evidence admitted; relevant to motive; no abuse of discretion demonstrated
Admission of crime-scene photographs Photos eight–nine hours post-mortem were prejudicial Photographs aided understanding of crime scene No abuse of discretion; photographs helped explain testimony; lack of ruling on prejudice preserved on appeal
Custodial statements and Miranda warnings Statements before warnings were involuntary Most statements spontaneous, not interrogation Circuit court's denial affirmed; spontaneous statements admissible; suppression affirmed only for one portion

Key Cases Cited

  • Camp v. State, 381 S.W.3d 11 (Ark. 2011) (sufficiency-of-evidence and directed-verdict standards cited in review)
  • Jackson v. State, 321 Ark. 46, 900 S.W.2d 515 (Ark. 1995) (jury credibility and medical-causation weight for death determination)
  • Windsor v. State, 338 Ark. 649, 1 S.W.3d 20 (Ark. 1999) (concurrent-causes doctrine in homicide causation)
  • Echols v. State, 326 Ark. 917, 936 S.W.2d 509 (Ark. 1996) (motive evidence admissibility)
  • Sasser v. State, 338 Ark. 375, 993 S.W.2d 901 (Ark. 1999) (contemporaneous-objection rule and post-conviction emphasis)
  • Wicks v. State, 270 Ark. 781, 606 S.W.2d 366 (Ark. 1980) (plain-error and contemporaneous objections)
  • Harris v. State, 363 Ark. 502, 215 S.W.3d 666 (Ark. 2005) (plain-error doctrine limitations)
  • Stone v. State, 321 Ark. 46, 900 S.W.2d 515 (Ark. 1995) (spontaneous statements and interrogation standards)
  • Sweet v. State, 2011 Ark. 20, 370 S.W.3d 510 (Ark. 2011) (spontaneous custodial statements admissibility)
  • Terry v. State, 309 Ark. 64, 826 S.W.2d 817 (Ark. 1992) (interrogation and custodial-recording considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Nov 3, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ark. 461
Docket Number: No. CR 11-331
Court Abbreviation: Ark.