847 F. Supp. 2d 1128
S.D. Iowa2012Background
- Petition filed in Iowa state court by The Estate of Norman Anderson; removed to federal court on Sept. 8, 2011.
- Amended Complaint dated Oct. 11, 2011 names Lana Anderson as Administrator of the Estate; original petition later deemed moot.
- Defendants moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) asserting lack of standing; resistance followed.
- Plaintiff asserts nine claims including breach of contract, wrongful death, FMLA/ADA-related claims; Defendants move to dismiss Count III (fraud) and Count VI (wrongful discharge).
- Court analyzes Iowa survivor statutes (Iowa Code §§ 611.20, 611.22) and Federal Rule 17 real-party-in-interest doctrine; holds timely amendment avoids statute-of-limitations concerns for the real party in interest.
- Court grants in part: Counts III and VI dismissed; other counts survive for further development.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standing/real party in interest under survivor statutes | Estate lacked standing; amendment needed | Estate cannot toll limitations; original filing void | Rule 17 cures and allows amendment; no automatic bar to all claims |
| Fraud claim sufficiency under Rule 9(b) and Iqbal | Sick Leave Policy communications and emails show misrepresentation | No particularized facts showing misrepresentation or intent to deceive | Count III dismissed for failure to plead fraud with particularity and plausibility |
| Wrongful discharge preemption under FMLA/workers' comp | Public policy supports wrongful discharge for FMLA-related actions; injury linked to employment | FMLA preempts state wrongful-discharge claims; workers’ comp may preclude relief | Count VI dismissed to the extent based on FMLA/Public policy; remaining theory may proceed if independent basis shown |
| Wrongful death claim viability | Death caused by work-related distress; not barred by exclusive remedy | Workers’ compensation exclusive remedy bars wrongful death claims arising out of employment | Not preempted at this stage; workers’ comp preemption may be raised later with developed record |
| Scope of Rule 17 and amendment timing | Amendment promptly after error avoided tolling | Original filing void; limits tolling | Amendment timely; action treated as if commenced by real party in interest |
Key Cases Cited
- Estate of Dyer v. Krug, 533 N.W.2d 221 (Iowa 1995) (survivor statutes; wrongful death damages vest in estate representative)
- Crowder v. Gordons Transports, Inc., 387 F.2d 413 (8th Cir.1967) (Rule 17 aims to prevent forfeiture when real party in interest is unclear)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (U.S. 2009) (two-pronged plausibility standard; distinguish factual from legal allegations)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (U.S. 2007) (plausibility standard; pleadings must show plausible entitlement to relief)
- Kientzy v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 990 F.2d 1051 (8th Cir.1993) (emotional distress not preempted by workers’ compensation unless employment injury linked)
- Lantz v. Berry, 803 N.W.2d 106 (Iowa 2011) (wrongful discharge; public policy constraints and statutory remedies)
- Waterhouse v. Water Conditioning, Inc., 561 N.W.2d 55 (Iowa 1997) (injury arising out of employment includes mental injury with sufficient causation)
- Meade v. Ries, 642 N.W.2d 237 (Iowa 2002) (test for injury arising in course of employment)
- Kostelac v. Feldman’s Inc., 497 N.W.2d 853 (Iowa 1993) (suicide causation linked to employment injury topic in workers’ comp)
- Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Cas. Co., 526 N.W.2d 845 (Iowa 1995) (mental injury standards under workers’ compensation)
