History
  • No items yet
midpage
955 N.E.2d 236
Ind. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Todd A. Anderson and Shauna Anderson divorced in 1995; they had one child, D.A., born 1994, with an initial weekly child support of $25.
  • Todd became disabled in 2001 and began receiving $771 monthly Social Security disability benefits (SSD).
  • D.A. began receiving $68 monthly from Todd’s SSD, totaling $9,314 by the petition date, including a $240 lump sum in 2001.
  • On November 16, 2010, Todd filed a Petition to Modify Support Obligation and Apply Credit.
  • At a February 28, 2011 hearing, the court credited the $240 lump sum against arrearage but denied credit for ongoing periodic SSD payments; ongoing support set at $19/week.
  • Todd appeals arguing that periodic SSD payments should be credited against his pre-petition arrearage; the issue is whether full periodic SSD credits should apply.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Credit against pre-petition arrearage for periodic SSD payments? Anderson argues Guideline 3(G)(5) allows full credit for periodic SSD. Brown precludes retroactive credit against pre-petition arrearages. Credit for periodic SSD payments is allowed; remand to compute amount.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brown v. Brown, 849 N.E.2d 610 (Ind.2006) (lump-sum SSD credits not retroactive to pre-petition arrearages)
  • Hieston v. State, 885 N.E.2d 59 (Ind.Ct.App.2008) (SSD payments treated as child-support-related earnings)
  • Reese v. Reese, 696 N.E.2d 460 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (pure question of law standard of review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Anderson
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 12, 2011
Citations: 955 N.E.2d 236; 2011 WL 4828892; 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1807; 47A01-1104-DR-159
Docket Number: 47A01-1104-DR-159
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
Log In
    Anderson v. Anderson, 955 N.E.2d 236