History
  • No items yet
midpage
406 S.W.3d 479
Mo. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Garnishors obtained a $6,984 judgment against Employee Mark Griep; they served a writ of garnishment on Employer Colt Industries to collect.
  • Employee orally told Employer he claimed the Missouri "head of family" exemption; Employer withheld 10% of Employee’s 1099 earnings accordingly.
  • Garnishors objected, arguing Employer should have withheld 25% absent written verification of the exemption and sought judgment against Employer for the $3,996 difference plus fees.
  • Trial court entered judgment against Employer for the difference and declined to award Employer fees; Employer appealed.
  • The appellate court considered whether a garnishee must obtain written verification of a head-of-family claim and whether Employer was entitled to costs and attorney’s fees under Rule 90.12 and Rule 84.21.

Issues

Issue Garnishors' Argument Employer's Argument Held
Whether a garnishee must obtain written verification before applying the head-of-family exemption to limit withholding to 10% Written verification required (relying on analogy to levy/levying-officer exemption procedures) No written verification required; oral claim and knowledge suffice under §525.030 and Rule 90.15 Reversed trial court: no written verification required for garnishees; 10% withholding proper
Whether Employer is entitled to costs and attorney’s fees after garnishor filed exceptions but did not obtain judgment against garnishee Garnishors did not address this favorably Employer argued Rule 90.12 mandates fees when garnishor files exceptions but does not obtain judgment against garnishee Employer entitled to costs and attorney’s fees under Rule 90.12; appellate costs under Rule 84.21 awarded

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Andrews, 329 S.W.3d 369 (Mo. banc 2010) (standard for statutory interpretation/review de novo)
  • Moore Auto. Grp., Inc. v. Goffstein, 301 S.W.3d 49 (Mo. banc 2009) (garnishment governed by chapter 525 and Rule 90)
  • A & L Underground, Inc. v. Leigh Const., Inc., 162 S.W.3d 509 (Mo.App.W.D.2005) (Rule 90.12(b) mandatory fee award)
  • City of Willow Springs v. Mo. State Librarian, 596 S.W.2d 441 (Mo. banc 1980) (statutory construction principles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Anani v. Griep
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 6, 2013
Citations: 406 S.W.3d 479; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 895; 2013 WL 3989641; No. ED 99158
Docket Number: No. ED 99158
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In
    Anani v. Griep, 406 S.W.3d 479