History
  • No items yet
midpage
Americorp Financial, L.L.C. v. Lansing Pharmacy, L.C.
923 F. Supp. 2d 1023
E.D. Mich.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Americorp Financial, L.L.C. sued Lansing Pharmacy, L.C. to recover on two equipment finance agreements for two dispensing systems and on related guaranties by Winters, Winters Pharmacies, Inc., and Winters Companies.
  • The agreements required Lansing Pharmacy to make sixty monthly payments; guaranties were unconditional.
  • The agreements were amended on June 23, 2010 to modify payment terms.
  • Lansing Pharmacy allegedly defaulted on payments beginning May 2011.
  • Plaintiff seeks summary judgment on liability and possession of the equipment, with damages to be determined later; Defendants argue good faith and mitigation defenses.
  • The court granted in part: liability determined, damages to be addressed after further submissions; potential issues about post-default remedies and cure were left for later consideration.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether defendants are liable on the finance agreements and guaranties Lansing defaulted; amendments did not extinguish liability Defendants contend bad faith and failure to mitigate damages Liability established; damages to be determined later
Whether Plaintiff acted in good faith and mitigated damages Plaintiff pursued contract remedies; no duty to substitute remedies absent mutual agreement Plaintiff failed to mitigate and acted in bad faith No genuine issue; Plaintiff acted within contract and law; defenses rejected
Whether damages and attorney fees can be determined on record Damages and fees calculable from existing record; sales of equipment acceptable Need opportunity to challenge disposition of equipment Damages to be set after objections; court may enter judgment if no timely objections

Key Cases Cited

  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (U.S. 1986) (summary judgment standard: movant must show no genuine issue of material fact)
  • Calderone v. United States, 799 F.2d 254 (6th Cir. 1986) (summary judgment burden when moving party has burden of proof at trial)
  • Pack v. Damon Corp., 434 F.3d 810 (6th Cir. 2006) (nonmovant must cite to record evidence; mere allegations insufficient)
  • Sperle v. Michigan Department of Corrections, 297 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 2002) (admissibility and personal knowledge requirements for affidavits)
  • Morris v. Clawson Tank Co., 459 Mich. 256, 587 N.W.2d 253 (Mich. 1998) (damages mitigation under Michigan law)
  • Quality Products & Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc., 469 Mich. 362, 666 N.W.2d 251 (Mich. 2003) (contract modification requires writing; anti-waiver clauses enforceable)
  • State Mutual Life Assurance Co. v. Deer Creek Park, 612 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1979) (restrictions on evidence and reliance in summary judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Americorp Financial, L.L.C. v. Lansing Pharmacy, L.C.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Date Published: Feb 8, 2013
Citation: 923 F. Supp. 2d 1023
Docket Number: Case No. 11-14795
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Mich.