2 N.E.3d 3
Ind.2014Background
- City of Boonville sought to annex 1,165 acres west of Boonville; landowners remonstrated in 2008.
- Remonstrance required 65% of landowners or 75% of assessed land value under Ind. Code § 36-4-3-11(a).
- Trial court addressed four threshold issues: exclude tax-exempt parcels, count waivers, count or exclude parcels under a boundary road, and standing to seek declaratory relief.
- Court of Appeals in Boonville I held tax-exempt property counted, remonstrance action proper, and adjacent landowner standing issue; those rulings became law of the case.
- Court of Appeals in Boonville II held State Road 62 parcels should be counted as a single parcel; Supreme Court granted transfer to review the 65% calculation.
- Supreme Court reverses, holds the SR 62 portion should be counted as a single parcel, and remands for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether adjoining SR 62 parcels are counted as one or multiple parcels for 65% remonstrance. | Boonville Landowners: count as a single parcel. | City: count as multiple parcels. | SR 62 counted as a single parcel. |
Key Cases Cited
- Arnold v. City of Terre Haute, 725 N.E.2d 869 (Ind. 2000) (how to count remonstrators—one-owner-one-vote vs. one-parcel-one-vote)
- City of Fort Wayne v. Certain Northeast Annexation Area Landowners, 564 N.E.2d 297 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990) (owners of multiple parcels; count as separate or per parcel ownership)
- City of Boonville v. Am. Cold Storage (Boonville I), 950 N.E.2d 764 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (tax-exempt, standing, and road-parcel handling as law of the case)
- City of Boonville v. Am. Cold Storage (Boonville II), 977 N.E.2d 19 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (State Road 62 counted as single parcel for 65% threshold)
