History
  • No items yet
midpage
Amazon.com Inc v. Parkhomenko
2:21-cv-01283
| W.D. Wash. | Jul 3, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Amazon.com, Inc. and Kirby Opc, LLC sued several defendants for selling counterfeit Kirby vacuum bags on Amazon's platform using fraudulent selling accounts and falsified documents to bypass Amazon’s authentication systems.
  • Defendants were divided into two groups: "Trafficker Defendants" (those who sold the goods) and "Facilitator Defendants" (those who enabled the scheme, e.g., by providing fake documentation).
  • Plaintiffs argued that the defendants’ actions harmed their brand, diverted sales, and deceived customers into believing counterfeits were legitimate.
  • After proper service, most defendants failed to appear or respond; the clerk entered default, and only one (Hapantsou) settled and was dismissed.
  • Plaintiffs pursued default judgment, seeking statutory damages and a permanent injunction, voluntarily dismissing claims for false advertising, fraud, and unjust enrichment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Trademark Infringement & Counterfeiting Defendants used counterfeit marks to deceive buyers and divert sales None (default) Plaintiffs' claims sustained, default judgment granted
False Designation of Origin Defendants' misuse deceived consumers and harmed goodwill None (default) Plaintiffs sufficiently pleaded injury and deception
Contributory Infringement/False Designation Facilitator Defendants knowingly aided primary violators via control/services None (default) Facilitators liable for contributory infringement
WA Consumer Protection Act Conduct was unfair, deceptive, harmed business and public interest None (default) Sufficient elements met for relief under state law
Intentional Interference with Contract Facilitators knowingly circumvented Amazon’s agreements and processes None (default) Plaintiffs adequately showed intentional interference
Statutory Damages and Injunctive Relief Requested damages are proportional, and permanent relief is warranted None (default) $196,686 damages awarded; permanent injunction granted

Key Cases Cited

  • Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986) (lists factors for default judgment)
  • Chan v. Soc’y Expeditions, Inc., 39 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994) (forum selection clause as basis for jurisdiction)
  • Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc., 194 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 1999) (standard for contributory infringement via service)
  • Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa Int’l Serv. Ass’n, 494 F.3d 788 (9th Cir. 2007) (knowledge/control required for contributory infringement)
  • Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2001) (irreparable harm includes loss of goodwill)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Amazon.com Inc v. Parkhomenko
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Washington
Date Published: Jul 3, 2025
Docket Number: 2:21-cv-01283
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Wash.