History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alvarez v. Castellon
55 A.3d 352
Del.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Automobile collision: Castellón rear-ended Rodriguez on April 15, 2010.
  • Rodriguez signed a release for $1,500 on April 20, 2010 after informing Nationwide of ongoing back/neck pain.
  • July 2010: specialist diagnosed a herniated thoracic disk; ongoing pain persisted.
  • February 18, 2011: Rodriguez filed a personal injury action against Castellón.
  • Superior Court granted summary judgment for Castellón on May 8, 2012, holding no mutual mistake; release valid.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Mutual mistake to set aside release Rodriguez: mutual mistake about injuries existed Castellón: release is clear; no mutual mistake No mutual mistake; release remains valid
Nature of injuries and relation to original trauma Injuries were materially different from initial injuries Injuries related to original trauma, not new Injuries related to original accident; not a new injury for mutual mistake
Effect of release language and standard of review Release ambiguous or misinterpreted due to injury extent Unambiguous release governs; de novo review Release language controls; no mutual mistake; judgment affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Tatman v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R.R. Co., 85 A. 716 (Del.Ch.1913) (mutual mistake must concern past/present material facts, not future effects)
  • Reason v. Lewis, 260 A.2d 708 (Del.1969) (mutuality exists where neither party is aware of injury)
  • LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp., 970 A.2d 185 (Del.2009) (Delaware upholds contractually valid releases unless mutual mistake)
  • Deuley v. DynCorp Int’l, Inc., 8 A.3d 1156 (Del.2010) (mutual mistake analysis in release context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Alvarez v. Castellon
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Oct 26, 2012
Citation: 55 A.3d 352
Docket Number: No. 304, 2012
Court Abbreviation: Del.