History
  • No items yet
midpage
Altoine Barker v. United States Postal Service
|
Read the full case

Background

  • The U.S. Postal Service proposed removing Altoine Barker from his City Carrier position; Barker filed an MSPB appeal and the union filed a grievance on his behalf.
  • The agency issued a removal decision; the union and agency later entered a Step B settlement that reduced the removal to a letter of warning, returned Barker to work, and made him whole for the removal period.
  • The settlement expressly stated it was a complete and final resolution of the grievance.
  • The administrative judge dismissed Barker’s MSPB appeal for lack of jurisdiction, reasoning the grievance settlement waived his Board appeal rights.
  • Barker petitioned for review arguing the union settled on its own behalf and he should not be bound; the Board denied review and affirmed the dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the MSPB has jurisdiction over a removal after the employee’s union settled the grievance by agreeing to reduced discipline Barker: The union acted on its own behalf when it settled, so he should not be bound and Board retains jurisdiction Agency: The grievance settlement was a voluntary, final resolution of Barker’s challenges and divests the Board of jurisdiction Board: Settlement presumed voluntary; Barker did not show involuntariness or reservation of Board rights; dismissal for lack of jurisdiction affirmed
Whether Barker rebutted the presumption that he waived MSPB appeal rights by participating in and accepting the grievance settlement Barker: He did not consent to waiver because the union allegedly acted independently Agency: Barker participated in grievance, acknowledged union representation, accepted substantially reduced penalty—no rebuttal Board: Barker failed to meet burden to reserve appeal rights; presumption of waiver stands

Key Cases Cited

  • Rhett v. U.S. Postal Service, 113 M.S.P.R. 178 (2010) (grievance settlement that reduces discipline presumptively divests the Board of jurisdiction)
  • Swink v. U.S. Postal Service, 111 M.S.P.R. 620 (2009) (same rule; settlement waives MSPB appeal absent a reservation)
  • Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service, 108 M.S.P.R. 502 (2008) (burden on employee to establish reservation of Board appeal rights)
  • Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 713 F.3d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (procedural note on providing correct appeal rights notice when Board lacks jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Altoine Barker v. United States Postal Service
Court Name: Merit Systems Protection Board
Date Published: Dec 14, 2016
Court Abbreviation: MSPB