History
  • No items yet
midpage
28 N.E.3d 247
Ind. Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • On March 7, 2012, Cleve Hatfield (driver) and Elaine Weiman were in a car accident; Allstate (Weiman’s insurer) paid $10,000 in medical expenses and sued Hatfields as subrogee.
  • The trial court entered an Order of Sanctions declaring Cleve at fault for the accident based on his discovery noncompliance.
  • Allstate filed a motion for summary judgment seeking the $10,000 in medical payments; Cleve filed a response 35 days after service (no extension requested).
  • Allstate moved to strike Cleve’s late response under Ind. Trial Rule 56(C); the trial court denied the motion to strike and denied summary judgment, finding genuine issues as to damages.
  • Allstate appealed interlocutorily; the Court of Appeals reviewed whether the trial court abused discretion in denying the motion to strike and whether summary judgment should have been entered.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of response under T.R. 56(C) Allstate: Cleve’s response was untimely (filed after 30 days) and should be stricken Cleve: (no brief filed on appeal; trial-court position was to deny strike) Court: Prima facie error—response untimely; trial court abused discretion in denying motion to strike
Effect of striking defendant’s response on summary judgment Allstate: Without Cleve’s response, only Allstate’s evidence of medical payments remains and there is no genuine issue of material fact Cleve: (no opposing appellate brief to contest substance) Court: With untimely response stricken, no genuine issue exists; summary judgment should have been granted for Allstate

Key Cases Cited

  • Thurman v. Thurman, 777 N.E.2d 41 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002) (appellee’s failure to file brief permits application of relaxed standard and reversal for prima facie error)
  • HomEq Servicing Corp. v. Baker, 883 N.E.2d 95 (Ind. 2008) (if nonmovant does not respond within 30 days, circuit court cannot consider subsequent filings)
  • Hughley v. State, 15 N.E.3d 1000 (Ind. 2014) (standard for reviewing summary judgment de novo; burden-shifting framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Allstate Insurance Company as Subrogee of Elaine Weiman v. Cleve W. Hatfield, and Michael W. Hatfield (mem. dec.)
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 6, 2015
Citations: 28 N.E.3d 247; 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 412; 2015 Ind. App. Unpub. LEXIS 233; 2015 WL 996187; 49A04-1408-CT-389
Docket Number: 49A04-1408-CT-389
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
Log In
    Allstate Insurance Company as Subrogee of Elaine Weiman v. Cleve W. Hatfield, and Michael W. Hatfield (mem. dec.), 28 N.E.3d 247