Allstate Ins. Co. v. Wagner
2014 Ohio 2505
Ohio Ct. App.2014Background
- Allstate sued Wagner for a 2002 Dayton motor-vehicle collision to recover subrogation funds.
- Service attempts targeted West Carrollton and then Miamisburg addresses; a certified mail receipt in Franklin County confirmed service.
- Default judgment for Allstate entered April 20, 2011 after Wagner failed to plead or defend.
- Wagner moved (Feb. 3, 2012) to vacate the default judgment and obtain leave to respond, citing Civ.R. 60(B) grounds.
- The trial court held a hearing was unnecessary and granted relief Oct. 3, 2013, vacating the default judgment; Allstate timely appealed.
- Court ultimately affirmed the vacation order, finding relief under Civ.R. 60(B) was proper despite an argument about 60(B)(3).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Civ.R. 60(B)(3) was properly applied to grant relief. | Allstate; no misconduct by adverse party; defense was forfeited. | Wagner; misconduct by adversary justifies relief under 60(B)(3). | No abuse of discretion; relief supported by 60(B)(5) rationale though 60(B)(3) cited. |
| Whether Civ.R. 60(B)(5) supported relief in the interest of justice. | Allstate argues 60(B)(5) was not appropriate. | 60(B)(5) proper to accomplish justice given late filing and lapse of statute. | Relief properly granted under 60(B)(5); harmless error to rely on 60(B)(3). |
Key Cases Cited
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Whiteman, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-536 (2013-Ohio-1636) (fraud/misconduct standard for Civ.R. 60(B)(3))
- PNC Bank, Natl. Assoc. v. Botts, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-256 (2012-Ohio-5383) (misconduct standards under Civ.R. 60(B)(3))
- GTE Automatic Elec., Inc. v. ARC Indus., Inc., 47 Ohio St.2d 146 (1976) (three-part test for Civ.R. 60(B) relief)
- Brunner Firm Co., L.P.A. v. Bussard, 10th Dist. No. 07AP-867 (2008-Ohio-4684) (60(B)(5) gives broad power to achieve justice)
- State ex rel. Gyurcsik v. Angelotta, 50 Ohio St.2d 345 (1977) (scope of Civ.R. 60(B)(5) authority)
- Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 (1949) (historical support for discretion under 60(B)(5))
