History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alliance v. Lilly
2017 Ohio 5788
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • At 1:58 a.m. Officer Michael Donley observed Roger Lilly make an excessively wide right turn, swinging nearly to the opposite curb and remaining in the opposite lane for about half a block.
  • Donley stopped Lilly for the wide turn and cited him for an improper turn, seatbelt violation, and operating a vehicle under the influence.
  • Lilly told the officer debris from a fire‑damaged building forced him to make the wide turn; Donley later returned to the scene and saw no debris.
  • Donley’s dash and POV camera footage captured the maneuver; Lilly testified and submitted photos taken the next morning of the damaged building.
  • Lilly moved to suppress, arguing the stop lacked reasonable, articulable suspicion; the municipal court denied the motion, and Lilly pleaded no contest and was convicted.
  • On appeal, the Fifth District reviewed de novo whether the facts supported the traffic stop and upheld the trial court’s finding of probable cause for the traffic citation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion/probable cause Officer had probable cause to stop for an observed traffic violation (wide right turn into left lane) Stop was unreasonable because debris from a fire‑damaged building necessitated the wide turn, so no violation occurred Court held the stop was reasonable; officer’s observations and video provided probable cause to stop and cite Lilly

Key Cases Cited

  • Fanning v. State, 1 Ohio St.3d 19 (appellate review standard for factual findings)
  • Klein v. State, 73 Ohio App.3d 486 (review of suppression factual findings)
  • Guysinger v. State, 86 Ohio App.3d 592 (suppression review principles)
  • Williams v. State, 86 Ohio App.3d 37 (error of law review)
  • Curry v. State, 95 Ohio App.3d 93 (de novo review of ultimate suppression issue)
  • Claytor v. State, 85 Ohio App.3d 623 (independent review of legal standard application)
  • Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (reasonable suspicion/probable cause reviewed de novo)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (framework for investigatory stops — specific and articulable facts)
  • State v. Freeman, 64 Ohio St.2d 291 (totality of circumstances for Terry stops)
  • Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (objective standard for traffic‑stop reasonableness)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Alliance v. Lilly
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 10, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ohio 5788
Docket Number: 2016CA00220
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.