History
  • No items yet
midpage
Allen v. Allen
2013 Ohio 2729
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Married July 7, 2007 in Muskingum County; no children were born of the marriage.
  • Plaintiff-wife filed Amended Divorce Complaint November 18, 2011; defendant-husband answered December 7, 2011; amended decree issued October 10, 2012.
  • Husband appealed October 30, 2012; appeal dismissed November 26, 2012 for failure to pay deposit.
  • Husband filed Civ.R. 60(B) motion January 8, 2013 alleging fraud and lack of defense due to incarceration.
  • Trial court denied the Civ.R. 60(B) motion March 7, 2013, holding no particularized fraud showing and noting lack of request to be present at final hearing.
  • Appellant appeals the March 7, 2013 judgment; appellee did not file a brief.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether due process was violated by absence at final hearing Allen asserts denial of due process due to incarceration and absence from hearing. Allen contends he was deprived of notice and defense; he requested access or transport to hearing. No due process violation; incarceration alone does not guarantee attendance; no request to attend was shown.
Whether equal protection rights were violated by absence at hearing Allen claims unequal treatment due to not being allowed to participate. Allen did not demonstrate differential treatment entitlement; civil proceeding does not grant absolute attendance right. No equal protection violation.
Whether trial court abused its discretion in denying Civ.R. 60(B) relief Fraud basis and lack of defense warrant vacating the decree. Motion alleged general fraud without particularized facts; no basis to set aside judgment. No abuse; motion lacked particularized facts and lawful basis to disturb decree.

Key Cases Cited

  • Schrader v. Schrader, 2012-Ohio-4032 (5th Dist. 2012) (res judicata applies to post-appeal Civ.R. 60(B) challenges when direct appeal was available)
  • Wagner v. Strip, 2012-Ohio-4954 (5th Dist. 2012) (divorce proceedings and due process considerations for incarcerated parties)
  • Alexander v. Alexander, 2007-Ohio-3933 (5th Dist. 2007) (no absolute due process right for prisoner to attend civil trial)
  • State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan, 91 Ohio St.3d 331 (2001) (prohibits broad expansion of post-judgment relief absent proper grounds)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Allen v. Allen
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 21, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 2729
Docket Number: CT2013-0015
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.