History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alfonso Laurence Solomon v. State
2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 10473
| Tex. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Solomon pled guilty to aggravated robbery under a plea agreement and received deferred adjudication for seven years.
  • As part of the deferral, Solomon was assessed $270 in court costs, with a condition to begin paying $20 per month after release from a substance abuse facility.
  • About two years later, the State moved to proceed to final adjudication for alleged violations of community supervision, including failure to repay costs.
  • At trial, Solomon pled true to some allegations and not true to the allegation regarding failure to repay costs; the court found him guilty and sentenced him to 20 years, with a written judgment imposing $570 in court costs.
  • The $570 costs represented a $300 increase over the original $270 assessed at the time of deferred adjudication.
  • Solomon appealed arguing the $300 increase had no evidentiary support and there was no finding of ability to pay; the State argued preservation was lacking but the court ultimately reviewed the record.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the $300 increase in costs had evidentiary support Solomon Solomon No evidentiary support for the increase; costs reformed to $270

Key Cases Cited

  • Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (insufficient evidence to support costs may be challenged on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Alfonso Laurence Solomon v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 19, 2012
Citation: 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 10473
Docket Number: 04-12-00239-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.