History
  • No items yet
midpage
183 So. 3d 821
La. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Ashley Alexander sued after a vehicle collision; defendants included the driver Maki M. Gregory and Crete Carrier Corporation.
  • Trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on June 26, 2014; the clerk mailed notice of that judgment on July 7, 2014.
  • Plaintiff requested written reasons on July 16, 2014; the trial judge later issued written reasons on October 14, 2014 (Clerk did not reflect mailing of those reasons).
  • Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on April 8, 2015, roughly nine months after the clerk mailed notice of the June 26 judgment.
  • Plaintiff argued the appeal was timely because it was filed immediately after receipt of the written reasons; court treated the appeal as taken from the June 26 judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of appeal Appeal is timely because filed after receipt of written reasons Appeal is untimely because notice of the June 26 judgment was mailed July 7, 2014 and started the appeal period Appeal untimely; dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Whether reasons for judgment restart appeal period Written reasons received restarted the ten-day appeal period Appeal period runs from receipt of notice of the judgment, not from reasons Reasons do not restart the appeal period; appeals are from judgments
Whether notice was required and when period commenced Receipt of written reasons controlled timing Notice of the judgment was required and mailing/receipt of that notice commenced the period Notice of judgment was required; mailing/receipt commenced the appeal period
Appellate court jurisdiction over untimely appeals Court should consider merits because reasons issued later Court lacks jurisdiction over untimely appeals and must dismiss sua sponte Court lacks jurisdiction and dismissed appeal as untimely

Key Cases Cited

  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Jimenez, 726 So.2d 465 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1999) (appeals are taken from the judgment, not reasons for judgment)
  • Franks v. West Jefferson Medical Center, 694 So.2d 1089 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1997) (distinguishing judgment from reasons for judgment for appeal timing)
  • Ziegel v. South Central Bell, 635 So.2d 314 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1994) (appeals are from the judgment, not the reasons)
  • Myles v. Turner, 612 So.2d 32 (La. 1993) (appeal period commences upon receipt of notice of judgment)
  • Smith v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 626 So.2d 750 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1993) (appellate court may dismiss untimely appeals for lack of jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Alexander v. Maki
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 4, 2016
Citations: 183 So. 3d 821; 2016 WL 65187; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 2; 2015 La.App. 5 Cir. 517; No. 15-CA-517
Docket Number: No. 15-CA-517
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    Alexander v. Maki, 183 So. 3d 821