History
  • No items yet
midpage
314 Ga. 459
Ga.
2022
Read the full case

Background

  • Riki Ray Albury was indicted for malice murder and related counts for the June 28, 2018 killing of Ronald Roach; tried September 2019, convicted of malice murder and other counts, sentenced to life plus consecutive probated terms; motion for new trial denied and appeal followed.
  • Evidence placed Albury at Roach’s apartment the night of the killing: witnesses (Prentiss Green, Kessiah Rowe) identified Albury at the scene; DNA on recovered underwear matched Roach, Albury, and Rowe.
  • Rowe testified she saw Smith attack Roach and that Albury watched, later admitting participation; Rowe also testified Smith displayed a knife during an earlier altercation.
  • Medical examiner Dr. Christy Cunningham performed the autopsy, identifying 38 stab wounds and blunt-force head trauma; the head injury was visible only after the scalp was peeled back, and a post-incision autopsy photograph showing that injury was admitted at trial.
  • Albury raised on appeal: (1) trial court’s failure to excuse two jurors for scheduling conflicts, (2) erroneous admission of a post-incision autopsy photograph under OCGA § 24-4-403, and (3) ineffective assistance of trial counsel (failure to seek juror questioning after a juror became ill and failure to request/preserve voluntary manslaughter instruction).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Albury) Defendant's Argument (State) Held
Trial court failed to excuse two jurors for cause (scheduling conflicts) Jurors had scheduling conflicts that warranted excusal No timely objection or motion to strike was made at trial Waived on appeal for failure to move to strike; no plain-error review available
Admission of post-incision autopsy photograph (Rule 403) Photo was gruesome, not necessary to show cause of death, should have been excluded under Rule 403 Photo was relevant; head injury only visible post-incision and tended to show blunt-force trauma suggesting another assailant No abuse of discretion; trial court implicitly applied Rule 403 and probative value outweighed prejudice
Ineffective assistance: counsel failed to request questioning of jurors after Juror 28 became ill Counsel should have pressed for voir dire of remaining jurors to detect bias caused by juror illness Counsel did not object at trial; no evidence that further questioning would have changed outcome No prejudice shown; even assuming deficient performance, Albury failed to show reasonable probability of a different outcome
Ineffective assistance: counsel failed to request voluntary manslaughter charge / failed to object to its removal Counsel should have preserved lesser-included instruction; voluntary manslaughter could avoid mandatory life Counsel and Albury chose an ‘‘all-or-nothing’’ strategy to assert nonparticipation and declined the plea; strategy was reasonable and discussed with client Strategy was not patently unreasonable; failure to request the charge did not establish deficient performance or prejudice

Key Cases Cited

  • Hill v. State, 310 Ga. 180 (2020) (failure to move to strike juror waives appellate review)
  • Venturino v. State, 306 Ga. 391 (2019) (autopsy-photo admissibility under Evidence Code; apply Rule 403 balancing)
  • Mitchell v. State, 307 Ga. 855 (2020) (evaluate autopsy photographs under Rules 401–403)
  • Allen v. State, 307 Ga. 707 (2020) (autopsy photos may be probative of nature/location of injuries even when cause of death is not disputed)
  • Moore v. State, 307 Ga. 290 (2019) (post-incision photos admissible when probative of circumstances of killing)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-prong ineffective-assistance standard: deficiency and prejudice)
  • Outlaw v. State, 311 Ga. 396 (2021) (pursuit of an all-or-nothing defense is permissible trial strategy)
  • Floyd v. State, 307 Ga. 789 (2020) (decisions about defenses and lesser charges are trial strategy)
  • Szorcsik v. State, 303 Ga. 737 (2018) (failure to request lesser offense instruction can be reasonable when counsel pursues all-or-nothing defense)
  • Jones v. State, 282 Ga. 47 (2007) (no prejudice shown from counsel's failure to inquire into juror conduct absent evidence outcome affected)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Albury v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 23, 2022
Citations: 314 Ga. 459; 877 S.E.2d 548; S22A0616
Docket Number: S22A0616
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In