History
  • No items yet
midpage
898 F.3d 648
5th Cir.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Hanger, Inc., a large provider of orthotic/prosthetic services, overstated pre-tax income by $87 million and restated financials for 2010–2014 after internal and Audit Committee investigations.
  • The Fund (Alaska Electrical Pension Fund) alleged 93 false/misleading statements during the Class Period (July 27, 2011–Feb 26, 2016) about same-store sales, Medicare audit success, reserves, Janus rollout disruptions, and adequacy of internal controls.
  • Audit Committee 8-Ks (Feb and June 2016) disclosed fabricated inventory records, ~$40M overstatement of accounts receivable/understated reserves, eleven material weaknesses, and concluded that former executives (including Kirk and CFO McHenry) set an “inappropriate tone at the top” and that some officers/employees engaged in inappropriate accounting to enhance results.
  • District court dismissed the §10(b) and §20(a) claims with prejudice for failure to plead scienter; plaintiffs appealed. The TAC incorporated the Audit Committee findings and added Kirk as a defendant.
  • The Fifth Circuit evaluated scienter under Tellabs/PSLRA standards (must plead particularized facts giving rise to a strong inference of intent or severe recklessness) and considered loss causation and control-person liability.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Scienter as to CFO McHenry Audit Committee findings, magnitude/duration of restatement, SOX certifications, and other facts show McHenry intentionally or with severe recklessness manipulated accounting Audit Committee language is non-specific/passive; alternative nonculpable explanations exist; alleged facts don’t show McHenry’s particular intent Reversed as to McHenry: collectively the June 8‑K and other allegations give a strong, cogent inference of scienter for McHenry (but only as to his statements)
Scienter as to CEO Kirk and CEO/President Asar Same pattern of allegations (restatement size, tone at top, Medicare/Janus problems, stock sales, SOX certifications) establish scienter Audit Committee does not attribute specific wrongful acts to them; allegations are group-based or equivocal; stock sales explained by 10b5‑1 and tax needs; no "special circumstances" to impute knowledge Affirmed as to Kirk and Asar: allegations do not establish a strong inference of scienter for them
Loss causation (did corrective disclosures cause investor losses?) A series of partial disclosures (Aug 2014 sales decline, Nov 2014 delay, Feb 2016 8‑K) revealed the truthful problems and precipitated price drops, making loss causation plausible Defendants argued corrective truth was already known or unrelated to alleged misstatements Rejected defendant challenge: the disclosure series plausibly revealed the fraud and the resulting price drops adequately plead loss causation
Control‑person (§20(a)) liability Individual defendants who controlled Hanger should be liable if primary §10(b) claims survive Control liability is secondary and depends on primary violation; defendants gave only cursory arguments Remanded: because §10(b) liability survives for McHenry and Hanger (re: McHenry’s statements), district court should decide §20(a) claims in first instance

Key Cases Cited

  • Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (holding that plausible scienter in securities cases must be cogent and as compelling as any nonculpable inference)
  • Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi v. Amedisys, Inc., 769 F.3d 313 (series of partial disclosures may together satisfy loss‑causation pleading)
  • Southland Securities Corp. v. INSpire Ins. Sols., Inc., 365 F.3d 353 (defendants’ positions alone do not establish scienter; limitations on group pleading)
  • Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Integrated Elec. Servs. Inc., 497 F.3d 546 (10b5‑1 plans and other documents can be considered at pleading stage to weigh competing inferences)
  • Owens v. Jastrow, 789 F.3d 529 (describing scienter/severe‑recklessness standard and Rule 9(b)/PSLRA pleading requirements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. Asar
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 6, 2018
Citations: 898 F.3d 648; No. 17-50162
Docket Number: No. 17-50162
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
Log In
    Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v. Asar, 898 F.3d 648