Ajeataz-Cor v. Sessions
690 F. App'x 756
| 2d Cir. | 2017Background
- Petitioner Higinio Medrano Ajeataz-Cor, a Guatemalan national, sought asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection after coming to the U.S.
- The IJ denied relief in a December 1, 2014 decision; the BIA affirmed on November 19, 2015. Petition for review followed to the Second Circuit.
- The agency acknowledged generalized gang violence and extortion in Guatemala but found no evidence that gangs target returnees from the U.S.
- Ajeataz-Cor’s application asserted friends were killed after returning from the U.S., but he offered no testimony or corroboration at hearing for that claim.
- He conceded he does not fear gang recruitment personally and said gangs had not tried to recruit his sons.
- The only issues before the court were whether he met the standard for withholding of removal and CAT relief based on a likelihood of future persecution or torture.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Withholding of removal — likelihood of persecution based on gang violence | Ajeataz-Cor argued he feared persecution if returned to Guatemala because of gang activity and returnees from U.S. | Govt: record shows general violence only; no evidence gangs target U.S. returnees or that petitioner faces individualized risk or protected-ground nexus | Denied — petitioner failed to show a likelihood of persecution; evidence was speculative and lacked support |
| CAT relief — likelihood of torture upon return | Ajeataz-Cor argued he would likely be tortured given country conditions and his asserted returnee status | Govt: no evidence government would acquiesce or that petitioner faces particularized torture risk beyond general violence | Denied — petitioner failed to demonstrate likelihood of torture; alternative government-acquiescence ground need not be reached |
Key Cases Cited
- Wangchuck v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 448 F.3d 524 (2d Cir. 2006) (court reviews both IJ and BIA decisions for completeness)
- Yanqin Weng v. Holder, 562 F.3d 510 (2d Cir. 2009) (standards of review for removal proceedings)
- Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 169 (2d Cir. 2004) (likelihood standard for withholding of removal and CAT relief)
- Melgar de Torres v. Reno, 191 F.3d 307 (2d Cir. 1999) (generalized country violence insufficient to show particularized risk)
- Jian Xing Huang v. U.S. INS, 421 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2005) (fear is speculative without solid record support)
- INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24 (1976) (courts need not decide unnecessary alternative grounds)
