midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2024 V.I. 22
Supreme Court of The Virgin Is...
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1989, Rosalina Marcano and her then-husband acquired nine plots of improved land on St. Croix, later solely owned by Marcano or her corporation after her divorce.
  • Marcano and Francisco Agueda entered into a series of agreements (2009 oral, 2010 handwritten, 2011 signed contract) for Agueda to purchase the property for $850,000, requiring staged payments, with Agueda permitted to collect rents and make repairs prior to closing.
  • Agueda made inconsistent payments and failed to pay the full purchase price; efforts to finalize the sale were impacted by Agueda’s inability to secure a loan and disputes over Marcano’s obligation to provide clear title to all plots.
  • Marcano filed suit in 2014 for breach of contract and related claims; Agueda counterclaimed for Marcano’s alleged breaches. The Superior Court found for both parties on different claims and offset damages.
  • Both parties appealed. The appeals were consolidated before the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Enforceability and Consideration of 2011 Contract 2011 Agreement was supported by consideration and binds both parties. No new consideration; terms unchanged from prior deals. 2011 Agreement valid; additional obligations imposed; enforceable.
Breach of Contract by Marcano Did not breach; no duty to clear all titles until written notice of final payment. Marcano failed to provide clear title, impeding loan and closing. Marcano did not breach; her duty was conditional on notice Agueda never gave.
Breach of Good Faith and Fair Dealing by Marcano Acted accord to contract; only collected rent due when Agueda stopped paying. Directly collected tenant rent, circumventing Agueda. No actionable breach; no damages shown by Agueda.
Damages and Remedies Entitled to full debt owed under 2011 agreement, including missed payments. Entitled to offset and specific performance due to partial performance. Marcano entitled to full, uncompensated debt; Agueda owes missed payments/fees.

Key Cases Cited

  • Plump v. Phillip, 66 VI 621 (VI 2017) (establishes fundamental elements for breach of contract claims)
  • Cornelius v. Bank of Nova Scotia, 67 VI 806 (VI 2017) (mutual assent and consideration required for contract formation)
  • Chapman v. Cornwall, 58 VI 431 (VI 2013) (implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in Virgin Islands contracts)
  • United Corp. v. Tutu Park Ltd., 55 VI 702 (VI 2011) (standard for contractual ambiguity and interpretation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Agueda v. Marcano
Court Name: Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Date Published: May 10, 2024
Citations: 2024 V.I. 22; SCT-CIV-2020-0030
Docket Number: SCT-CIV-2020-0030
Log In
    Agueda v. Marcano, 2024 V.I. 22