History
  • No items yet
midpage
Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Water & Land Conservation
123 So. 3d 47
| Fla. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Attorney General filed for an advisory opinion on validity of an initiative petition under Art. XI, §3 Florida Constitution.
  • Court has jurisdiction under Art. IV, §10; Art. V, §3(b)(10), Fla. Const.
  • Court concludes the amendment complies with single-subject, ballot title and summary, and financial impact statement.
  • The amendment would add Art. X, §28, establishing a Land Acquisition Trust Fund funded by 33% of net documentary tax revenues for 20 years.
  • Ballot title and summary state the fund dedication and purposes; financial impact statement addresses revenue and costs.
  • The Solicitor also sought an opinion on the accompanying financial impact statement under §100.371, Fla. Stat. (2012).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the amendment satisfies the single-subject constraint. Attorney General contends the amendment has a single dominant plan. Water and Land Legacy argues no unrelated provisions exist. Yes; single subject satisfied.
Whether the ballot title and summary fairly inform the chief purpose. AG asserts title/summary accurately reflect the dedication to Land Acquisition Trust Fund. Sponsor contends wording is clear and not misleading. Yes; complies with §101.161(1).
Whether the financial impact statement complies with §100.371(5). AG relies on statutory requirements for clarity and word limit. Sponsor assumes statement is sufficient. Yes; 75 words, clear and limited to revenues/costs.

Key Cases Cited

  • Fairness Initiative Requiring Legislative Determination that Sales Tax Exemptions & Exclusions Serve a Public Purpose, 880 So.2d 630 (Fla.2004) (single-subject analysis guidance for Ballot issues and public purpose)
  • Advisory Op. to the Att’y Gen. re Funding for Criminal Justice, 639 So.2d 972 (Fla.1994) (treatment of a trust-fund approach under single-subject review)
  • Advisory Op. re Everglades Sugar Production, 681 So.2d 1124 (Fla.1996) (summary of revenue-use limitation for dedicated funds)
  • Advisory Op. re Right to Treatment and Rehabilitation for Non-Violent Drug Offenses, 818 So.2d 491 (Fla.2002) (ballot title/summary inform voters of chief purpose)
  • Advisory Op. re Right of Citizens to Choose Health Care Providers, 705 So.2d 563 (Fla.1998) (importance of not misleading voters in title/summary)
  • Advisory Op. re Fla. Growth Mgmt. Initiative Giving Citizens the Right to Decide Local Growth Mgmt. Plan Changes, 2 So.3d 118 (Fla.2008) (financial impact statement may be indefinite but not unclear)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Water & Land Conservation
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Sep 26, 2013
Citation: 123 So. 3d 47
Docket Number: Nos. SC13-659, SC13-965
Court Abbreviation: Fla.