History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adoption of T.D.
2014 ME 36
| Me. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Guardians appeal a Hancock County Probate Court judgment denying termination of the child Tobias D.'s biological father's parental rights and ordering transition to Indiana.
  • Mother, living in Indiana, originally consented to guardianship/adoption but had implied the father was unknown.
  • Father RM contested paternity; initial adjudication accepted him as biological father for purposes of the proceedings.
  • DNA testing on remand confirmed RM as biological father; prior findings of unfitness were reconsidered.
  • Probate Court held guardians failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that RM was unfit to parent.
  • Guardians appeal, challenging the fitness finding, GAL handling, and the transition plan.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether RM is unfit to parent Tobias D. Guardians argue RM abandoned or failed to take responsibility. RM asserted he can and will meet the child's needs. Guardians failed to prove unfitness.
Whether GAL report/participation was properly considered. GAL biased; investigations improperly handled. GAL testimony credible and weightable. GAL reliance upheld; guardians' challenge deemed harmless error.
Whether transition plan lacked necessary non-compliance provisions. Plan should include non-compliance enforcement. Non-compliance provisions not mandatory; contempt per Rule 66(d) possible. No abuse; transition plan valid without non-compliance provision.

Key Cases Cited

  • Adoption of Tobias D., 40 A.3d 990 (Me. 2012) (remand for DNA; caution on relying on finances for fitness)
  • Baillargeon v. Estate of Daigle, 8 A.3d 709 (Me. 2010) (clear-and-convincing standard; review of record essential)
  • Dyer v. Superintendent of Ins., 69 A.3d 416 (Me. 2013) (credibility determinations left to fact-finder)
  • Pelletier v. Pelletier, 36 A.3d 903 (Me. 2012) (witness credibility; weight of GAL testimony)
  • Shaw v. Packard, 886 A.2d 1287 (Me. 2005) (Rule 61 harmless error; evidentiary challenges)
  • Lily T. Adoption, 997 A.2d 722 (Me. 2010) (incarceration not alone abandonment; focus on efforts to maintain relationship)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Adoption of T.D.
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Mar 4, 2014
Citation: 2014 ME 36
Docket Number: Docket Han-13-187
Court Abbreviation: Me.