History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adeyinka v. Perfect Privacy LLC
1:25-cv-00145
D.N.M.
Mar 11, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Emmanuel Adeyinka sued Perfect Privacy, LLC (a domain registrar) and Christopher Fagbolu regarding the domain "adeyinka.com" which shares Plaintiff’s last name.
  • Plaintiff alleged that defendants used the domain for identity theft, economic abuse, emotional distress, and other unlawful purposes since 2003.
  • Plaintiff asserted claims for cyberbullying, identity theft, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and unjust enrichment.
  • Plaintiff claimed diversity jurisdiction based on residency: he in Texas, Perfect Privacy in Florida, and Fagbolu in New Mexico.
  • Magistrate Judge Yarbrough identified pleading defects: no amount in controversy alleged, citizenship not adequately alleged (only residency), and no member citizenship alleged for the LLC; also, plaintiff’s factual allegations were insufficient to state a viable claim.
  • Plaintiff failed to respond to the court’s order to show cause or amend his complaint, and the court dismissed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, without prejudice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Diversity Jurisdiction Parties are from different states Not addressed in text Insufficient facts to establish jurisdiction
Amount in Controversy Implied damages over $75,000 Not addressed in text No allegation; jurisdiction not established
Citizenship (residency v. citizenship) Plaintiff and defendants reside in different states Not addressed in text Residency insufficient for citizenship
Stating valid claims Defendants caused harm through use of domain name Not addressed in text Claims not sufficiently pleaded

Key Cases Cited

  • Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Co., 781 F.3d 1233 (10th Cir. 2015) (LLC citizenship determined by citizenship of all members, not just registration)
  • Middleton v. Stephenson, 749 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2014) (citizenship requires intent to remain, not just residence)
  • Whitelock v. Leatherman, 460 F.2d 507 (10th Cir. 1972) (residency alone insufficient to establish federal jurisdiction)
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Dyer, 19 F.3d 514 (10th Cir. 1994) (citizenship requires more than residency)
  • Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp., 434 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2006) (dismissals for lack of jurisdiction are without prejudice)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Adeyinka v. Perfect Privacy LLC
Court Name: District Court, D. New Mexico
Date Published: Mar 11, 2025
Docket Number: 1:25-cv-00145
Court Abbreviation: D.N.M.