History
  • No items yet
midpage
Addison v. Jurgelsky
704 S.E.2d 402
Va.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Joseph Addison died on April 3, 2004 after treatment at Clinch Valley Medical Center.
  • Jerry Addison and Shirley Addison were appointed co-administrators of Joseph's estate.
  • Jerry filed a wrongful death action in March 2006 on behalf of the estate.
  • Defendants moved to abate, arguing Shirley (the other co-administrator) was not joined; court allowed Shirley to be joined and amended complaint filed September 12, 2008.
  • Defendants moved to dismiss as time-barred; circuit court granted the pleas; issue on appeal is tolling and joinder under the Wrongful Death Act.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Can a single co-administrator file a wrongful death action? Addison should be allowed to sue solo. Only the 'the personal representative' may sue; unity of action required. No; a single co-administrator may not file alone.
May an absent co-administrator be joined after expiration of the limitations period? Code § 8.01-5 permits late joinder for ends of justice. Time-bar cannot be tolled by joinder after expiration. Yes; joinder of Shirley as additional plaintiff is permitted and tolls the statute.
Did Jerry's initial filing toll the limitations period for Shirley’s claim? The filing tolled under Code § 8.01-244(B). Tolling did not extend to Shirley without joinder. Yes; Jerry's initial filing tolled the limitations period for Shirley.

Key Cases Cited

  • Beavers v. Beavers, 185 Va. 418, 39 S.E.2d 288 (1946) (administrators must join; avoids contrariety of action)
  • Cook v. Radford Community Hospital, Inc., 260 Va. 443, 451, 536 S.E.2d 906 (2000) (necessary party and standing considerations; misjoinder vs. lack of authority)
  • Mendenhall v. Douglas L. Cooper, Inc., 239 Va. 71, 387 S.E.2d 468 (1990) (time-barred against necessary party; cannot add)
  • Ahari v. Morrison, 275 Va. 92, 654 S.E.2d 891 (2008) (amendment timing and relation to statute of limitations)
  • City of Virginia Beach v. ESG Enters., 243 Va. 149, 413 S.E.2d 642 (1992) (statutory construction and words chosen by General Assembly)
  • Burns v. Board of Supervisors, 227 Va. 354, 315 S.E.2d 856 (1984) (purpose of statutes of limitations to protect defendants)
  • Carter v. Carter, 232 Va. 166, 349 S.E.2d 95 (1986) (policies behind limitations period)
  • Conger v. Barrett, 280 Va. 627, 702 S.E.2d 117 (2010) (statutory interpretation; de novo review)
  • Carroll v. Johnson, 278 Va. 683, 685 S.E.2d 647 (2009) (remedial construction of statutes; liberal reading)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Addison v. Jurgelsky
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Jan 13, 2011
Citation: 704 S.E.2d 402
Docket Number: 092361
Court Abbreviation: Va.