History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adams v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.
93 F. Supp. 3d 441
M.D.N.C.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Four named plaintiffs (Adams, Harrison, Whitfield, Kraemer) sued Citicorp Credit Services (Citi) alleging off-the-clock/ unpaid overtime work at Citi’s Greensboro call center, invoking the FLSA and NCWHA.
  • Citi moved to compel arbitration for Adams, Whitfield, and Kraemer based on a 2011 Employee Handbook Arbitration Policy that (1) requires individual arbitration for employment disputes and (2) contains a class/collective-action waiver.
  • Whitfield and Kraemer electronically acknowledged receipt of the 2011 Handbook; Adams did not acknowledge the 2011 Handbook but had acknowledged a 2009 Handbook that permitted prospective amendments.
  • Plaintiffs seek conditional certification of an FLSA collective of customer-service telephone operators at the Greensboro call center dating back three years; Plaintiffs submitted declarations describing uniform time-recording via a phone system that missed pre- and post-shift work.
  • The court found genuine fact issues whether Adams received notice of the 2011 amendment (so arbitration for him was deferred), compelled arbitration for Whitfield and Kraemer, denied a stay as to others for now, and conditionally certified a limited collective of telephone-system timekeeping customer-service operators.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether named plaintiffs agreed to arbitrate and waive collective actions Adams: did not assent to 2011 amendment; Whitfield/Kraemer: assented but waiver unenforceable because FLSA collective right is non-waivable Citi: 2011 Arbitration Policy applies; electronic acknowledgments establish assent and waiver of collective actions Whitfield and Kraemer must arbitrate individually; factual issue as to Adams (trial required on assent)
Enforceability of FLSA collective-action waiver Waiver invalid because collective mechanisms are essential to FLSA enforcement and thus non-waivable Waiver valid because collective action is procedural and parties may contractually waive it; FAA favors arbitration Waiver enforceable; court follows circuit and other appellate precedent upholding such waivers under the FAA
Temporal scope/prospective application of the 2011 waiver Waiver should not apply to claims based on 2010 conduct because 2009 Handbook said amendments apply prospectively only Arbitration clause broadly covers disputes “arising out of or in any way related to employment,” and waiver applies to proceedings filed after amendment Waiver applies to this case (claims/patterns are subject to the 2011 policy)
Conditional certification of FLSA collective Plaintiffs: modest showing met—declarations show common phone-based timekeeping that missed pre/post-shift work Citi: Plaintiffs’ showing is insufficient; proof varies by department, timekeeping system, manager, period Court conditionally certifies a class limited to customer-service telephone operators who used the telephone system to record time since March 22, 2009

Key Cases Cited

  • Moses H. Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1 (1983) (establishes federal policy favoring arbitration)
  • Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Byrd, 470 U.S. 213 (1985) (agreements to arbitrate must be enforced)
  • Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006) (presumption favoring arbitration of arbitrable issues)
  • Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985) (effective vindication doctrine and arbitration)
  • Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc., 303 F.3d 496 (4th Cir. 2002) (FLSA collective-action waiver enforceability analysis in Fourth Circuit)
  • D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB, 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013) (upholding class/collective waivers against NLRB challenges)
  • Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP, 726 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2013) (collective-action waiver enforcement under FAA)
  • Walthour v. Chipio Windshield Repair, LLC, 745 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2014) (textual analysis concluding FLSA does not bar waivers of collective actions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Adams v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 20, 2015
Citation: 93 F. Supp. 3d 441
Docket Number: No. 1:12CV286
Court Abbreviation: M.D.N.C.