History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adam Musser v. Terry Mapes
718 F.3d 996
8th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Musser was convicted in four trials under Iowa Code § 709C.1 for criminal transmission of HIV.
  • He knew he was HIV-positive and did not disclose his status to four women during 2002–2003 unprotected sex.
  • The statute criminalizes intimate contact with another while aware of positive HIV status; intimate contact includes exposure to bodily fluids and need not result in infection.
  • Iowa Supreme Court affirmed all convictions and a 50-year aggregate sentence; Musser then sought § 2254 habeas relief, which the district court denied; this court affirmed denial.
  • Musser challenges the statute as vague and overbroad; the district court and Iowa Supreme Court had addressed the underlying facts and applications.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Vagueness as applied to §709C.1 Musser claims lack of fair notice; terms vague. State maintains Musser had fair notice; unprotected intercourse fit within "intimate contact." Not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Musser.
Overbreadth and First Amendment scope Seeks First Amendment overbreadth relief for private intimate conduct. Right to intimate association is not a First Amendment issue here; case falls under due process. Overbreadth claim not cognizable as a First Amendment challenge; affirm."

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (U.S. 2008) (void-for-vagueness standard; notice requirement)
  • United States v. Nat'l Dairy Prods. Corp., 372 U.S. 29 (S. Ct. 1963) (vagueness requires reasonable understanding of prohibited conduct)
  • Village of Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489 (U.S. 1982) (vagueness-applied as to individuals; Flipside applied to others")
  • Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (U.S. 1973) (overbreadth generally limited to First Amendment challenges)
  • Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (U.S. 2003) (substantive due process; privacy interests in private intimate conduct)
  • Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1984) (distinction between freedom of association and related rights)
  • State v. Keene, 629 N.W.2d 360 (Iowa 2001) (reasonable notice of HIV transmission during intercourse (Iowa))
  • State v. Musser, 721 N.W.2d 734 (Iowa 2006) (Iowa Supreme Court decision affirming convictions and noting notice of transmission)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Adam Musser v. Terry Mapes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 24, 2013
Citation: 718 F.3d 996
Docket Number: 12-2195
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.