210204-133580
210204-133580
| Board of Vet. App. | Aug 31, 2021Background
- Veteran executed a VA Form 21-22 POA and a written fee agreement with attorney S.D. on June 4, 2012 (20% contingent, direct-pay specified).
- S.D. filed a Notice of Disagreement in September 2012 challenging an August 2012 RO denial of the low-back claim.
- S.D. submitted a letter withdrawing representation on February 16, 2015; the withdrawal was accepted by VA (RO notified March 26, 2015).
- The low-back claim was ultimately granted by the RO in December 2020 (award effective April 18, 2011), producing past-due benefits.
- Veteran elected Direct Review under the AMA in February 2021; AOJ initially authorized withholding 20% of past-due benefits for S.D.'s fee.
- Board found S.D. entitled to direct payment only for the period when he was the Veteran’s representative (May 7, 2012–February 16, 2015), noting the Veteran was unrepresented for ~4+ years and pursued post-2015 development himself.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether attorney is eligible for direct payment of fees from past-due benefits and for what period | Veteran: fee award was calculated using an incorrect representation period; fees should be limited to when S.D. actually represented him | S.D./AOJ: valid June 2012 fee agreement and POA supported direct payment of 20% of past-due benefits | Board: S.D. is eligible for direct payment but only for May 7, 2012–Feb 16, 2015 |
Key Cases Cited
- None — the decision cites statutes and VA regulations only (no reported cases were relied upon).
