History
  • No items yet
midpage
16-07 693
16-07 693
| Board of Vet. App. | May 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served in Korea (Jan 1952–Sep 1953), awarded Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge; records include destroyed service treatment records.
  • Appeals from RO rating decisions (Nov 2012, Feb 2013, Apr 2014); TDIU later granted from May 23, 2014.
  • Claims before the Board: higher initial rating for service‑connected bilateral hearing loss; service connection for lumbar spine, upper‑lip scar, and left shoulder (latter two deferred/remanded).
  • VA obtained multiple audiometric VA examinations (2013, Feb 2014, Sep 2014) and one private audiogram (Mar 2012); speech discrimination and pure‑tone averages translated to noncompensable numeric levels under DC 6100.
  • Veteran consistently reported a mortar explosion in service causing facial burns and an upper‑lip scar; scar measured and described on VA exam.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Higher initial rating for bilateral hearing loss Veteran contends hearing loss is compensable based on symptoms and audiology VA relies on VA audiograms applying 38 C.F.R. § 4.85/DC 6100 showing noncompensable numeric levels Denied — preponderance of evidence supports noncompensable rating for entire period
Service connection for scar on upper lip Veteran asserts scar from mortar explosion in combat in Korea (in‑service injury) VA notes destroyed service records but developed file and exams; contests direct record evidence Granted — benefit of the doubt applied; scar service‑connected based on credible lay statements and exam
Service connection for lumbar spine disability Veteran reports in‑service back injuries (running with gear) VA contends record lacks sufficient medical nexus opinion REMANDED — additional VA exam/opinion ordered to determine current disability and nexus
Service connection for left shoulder disability (including DJD) Veteran alleges shoulder trauma in service VA finds insufficient medical development to determine service nexus REMANDED — VA exam/opinion ordered to determine diagnosis and nexus

Key Cases Cited

  • Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 183 (2002) (VA notice obligations)
  • Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007) (duty to assist — adequacy of VA examination)
  • Lendenmann v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 345 (1992) (mechanical application of audiometric tables)
  • Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990) (benefit of the doubt doctrine)
  • Thun v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 111 (2008) (extraschedular referral threshold)
  • Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (extraschedular consideration for combined effects)
  • McLendon v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 79 (2006) (when VA must provide an examination)
  • Cromer v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 215 (2005) (effects of destroyed service records on VA duty to assist)
  • Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (elements for service connection)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 16-07 693
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: May 31, 2017
Docket Number: 16-07 693
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.