History
  • No items yet
midpage
13-10 523
13-10 523
Board of Vet. App.
May 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served on active duty Nov 1960–May 1963 and sought service connection for a low back disorder.
  • Initial RO denial (June 2011) was appealed through NOD, SOC, and VA Form 9; Board hearings and remands took place (including remands in Mar 2015 and Jan 2016).
  • Medical record: July 2010 lumbar MRI and March 2011 diagnosis of multilevel lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD); earlier VA/medical notes include an Oct 1963 VA exam reporting back pain beginning in service and an Aug 1965 Tripler record reporting intermittent pain since service.
  • VA examiner (May 2016 addendum) concluded DDD is most likely due to aging and post-service work (roofing, climbing), noting no chronic back diagnosis at separation and progressive imaging after service.
  • Board found the May 2016 opinion relied heavily on absence of a DDD diagnosis in service and did not adequately address Veteran’s contemporaneous lay reports (Oct 1963, Aug 1965) or post-March 2017 VA records; remand ordered for further development and a new/addendum opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Service connection for low back disorder Veteran: back pain began in service (ruck-sacking), continuous since service VA: objective evidence supports aging/post-service work etiology, no chronic DDD at separation Remanded for further development; no final decision on service connection
Adequacy of medical nexus opinions Veteran: existing opinions fail to consider contemporaneous lay reports and full record VA: prior addendum addressed etiology but relied on lack of in-service DDD diagnosis Board: May 2016 opinion inadequate; order addendum opinion that reviews all pertinent in-/post-service evidence and addresses lay assertions

Key Cases Cited

  • McLendon v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 79 (discusses VA obligation to obtain adequate medical opinions)
  • Sullivan v. McDonald, 815 F.3d 786 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (VA constructive possession of VA treatment records)
  • Dunn v. West, 11 Vet. App. 462 (1998) (treatment of VA records in claims adjudication)
  • Bell v. Lewinski, 2 Vet. App. 611 (1992) (VA records and claims file association)
  • Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999) (claimant may submit additional evidence during remand period)
  • Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (1998) (remand directives must be complied with by AOJ)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 13-10 523
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: May 31, 2017
Docket Number: 13-10 523
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.