History
  • No items yet
midpage
12-25 231
12-25 231
| Board of Vet. App. | Aug 31, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served May 1968–May 1970; initial RO decision in Feb 2010; March 2015 Board denied low back but Court vacated that portion by joint remand in Dec 2015.
  • Medical history includes in-service complaints of low back pain in 1969, private treatment and surgery (hemilaminectomy/discectomy) in 1976–1977, and later VA exams diagnosing lumbar degenerative disc disease, status-post hemilaminectomy.
  • Veteran consistently reported back pain since service and attributed later worsening to a 1976 fall and to falls caused by his service‑connected right ankle disability.
  • VA examiners (2008, 2012) concluded no nexus to service or to ankle; a June 2016 private orthopedic opinion (Dr. M) reviewed records, cited literature, and concluded the lumbar pathology was related to the in‑service injury and progressive to surgery.
  • The Board found the private opinion more probative because it weighed the Veteran’s consistent lay statements and provided detailed rationale; service connection for lumbar DDD, status‑post hemilaminectomy, was granted.
  • Claims for an increased rating for the right ankle and for TDIU were not finally adjudicated and were remanded for further development and an adequate VA ankle exam (per Correia-related concerns) and for TDIU development.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Service connection for lumbar spine degenerative disc disease (status‑post hemilaminectomy) Back disorder began in service (1969 complaints), continued post‑service, and private expert ties current pathology to in‑service injury and progression VA examiners said no nexus: gap in treatment between 1970 and 1976 and no medical literature linking ankle to back Granted: Board found private opinion more probative, credited Veteran's lay statements, and awarded service connection
Increased rating for right ankle residuals (currently 10%) Severity warrants higher rating; Veteran reports functional loss/instability causing falls VA record lacks adequate recent ankle exam data; prior VA exam inadequate under current caselaw Remanded for new, detailed VA exam (active/passive, weight‑bearing/nonweight‑bearing testing; DBQ)
Total Disability based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU) Dr. M opined Veteran is unable to work due to service‑connected conditions AOJ had not adjudicated TDIU; further development needed Remanded for development and AOJ adjudication of TDIU before appellate review

Key Cases Cited

  • Holton v. Shinseki, 557 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (elements of service connection and nexus requirement)
  • Walker v. Shinseki, 708 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (continuity of symptoms may establish chronicity for presumptive service connection)
  • Caluza v. Brown, 78 F.3d 604 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (factors for assessing witness credibility and probative value of lay statements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 12-25 231
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Aug 31, 2016
Docket Number: 12-25 231
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.