12-22 874
12-22 874
| Board of Vet. App. | Aug 31, 2017Background
- Veteran served in the U.S. Army April 1966–November 1967; appeal from Houston RO decision (June 2011) with Board remand in Dec 2014.
- Service-connected PTSD previously rated 50% and claimed for increase; multiple VA exams (2009, 2010, 2015, 2016) and treatment notes document symptoms including hypervigilance, nightmares, depression, substance abuse, auditory/visual hallucinations, suicidal ideation, impaired concentration, and reduced socialization.
- Examiners variably found the Veteran capable of some household tasks and church attendance; some opinions noted intermittent inability to perform occupational tasks, but not continuous total impairment.
- Wife’s 2017 lay statement reported constant nightmares, a prior suicide attempt, confusion while driving, inability to manage finances, and social isolation.
- Board concluded PTSD symptomatology approximated criteria for a 70% rating (since March 21, 2007) but not 100%, and granted TDIU effective April 22, 2010 based on combined effects of PTSD and service-connected ankle disability.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether PTSD rating should exceed 50% | PTSD causes deficiencies in most areas (suicidal ideation, hallucinations, hypervigilance, impaired concentration) warranting ≥70% or 100% | Remaining functional abilities (household tasks, church attendance, coherent thought/speech) do not meet 100% criteria; some exams note ability to seek work | 70% rating granted from March 21, 2007; 100% denied |
| Entitlement to TDIU | Veteran unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment due to PTSD (short temper, poor concentration) and ankle disability | Veteran met schedular criteria earlier but continued working until 2010; functional evidence mixed but combined disabilities preclude substantially gainful employment after leaving work | TDIU granted effective April 22, 2010 |
Key Cases Cited
- Mauerhan v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 436 (2002) (symptom lists in rating criteria are illustrative and permit consideration of similar manifestations and their occupational/social effects)
- Esteban v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 259 (1994) (prohibition on pyramiding; separate ratings allowed only for distinct, non-overlapping symptomatology)
