09-50 948
09-50 948
| Board of Vet. App. | Feb 28, 2017Background
- Veteran served active duty Oct 1987–Jul 1990; filed claims for residuals of left wrist fracture and bronchial asthma (claimed Nov 14, 2005). VA granted service connection and assigned initial ratings (10% wrist; 30% asthma) in Oct 2006 and confirmed in Jun 2008.
- Veteran sought higher ratings; multiple remands and hearings were conducted or scheduled between 2010–2016; veteran ultimately failed to appear for a 2014 hearing and request considered withdrawn. Case returned to Board after remands for further development and examinations (most recent VA exam May 2016).
- Medical evidence: serial VA exam reports (2006, 2008, 2011, 2016) and treatment records showing active left wrist range of motion (no ankylosis) and asthma with PFTs showing FEV-1 ~63–66% pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator improvement to ~67–72%, daily inhaled bronchodilator/inhaled steroid therapy, and up to two systemic corticosteroid courses in one year (2010).
- Legal framework: ratings governed by VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (Diagnostic Codes 5214/5215 for wrist; 6602 for asthma); higher schedular or extraschedular ratings considered only if criteria met or schedular criteria inadequate; staged ratings and TDIU considered and rejected on record.
- Board’s factual findings: wrist never manifested ankylosis during the appeal period; asthma manifestations approximated FEV-1 ~63% pre/67% post, FEV-1/FVC ~57–59%, daily inhaled therapy, and at most two systemic corticosteroid courses in a year — not meeting criteria for >30%.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether entitlement to an initial rating >10% for residuals of left wrist fracture is warranted | Veteran: increased pain, stiffness, decreased ROM, flare-ups, functional loss justify higher rating | VA/Board: medical record shows preserved active ROM, no ankylosis; 10% is schedular maximum for limitation of motion | Denied — no evidence of ankylosis; 10% remains appropriate |
| Whether entitlement to an initial rating >30% for bronchial asthma is warranted | Veteran: more frequent/severe attacks, increased medication, monthly doctor visits, systemic steroid treatments justify >30% | VA/Board: PFTs show FEV-1 and FEV-1/FVC consistent with 30% criteria; inhaled meds documented; systemic steroids occurred at most twice in one year; no monthly exacerbation visits or respiratory failure episodes | Denied — objective tests and treatment record do not meet criteria for >30% |
| Whether additional VA development or a new exam is required (Correia compliance / further testing) | Veteran/Representative: request for independent medical opinion and further development due to evidentiary conflict | VA/Board: exams adequate for decision; Correia-compliant testing not necessary because ankylosis (required for higher wrist rating) is absent; veteran missed scheduled PFTs without showing good cause | No remand required; decision based on existing competent medical evidence |
| Whether extraschedular evaluation, staged ratings, or TDIU are warranted | Veteran: asserted increased severity and functional impact (work limitations) | VA/Board: no exceptional/collective impact beyond schedular criteria; disability picture stable for appeal period; veteran employed | Denied — no extraschedular referral, no staged ratings, no TDIU awarded |
Key Cases Cited
- Golz v. Shinseki, 590 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir.) (records relevancy requirement for VA requests)
- Sullivan v. McDonald, 815 F.3d 786 (Fed. Cir.) (clarifying VA record-request standards)
- Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (Vet. App.) (remand compliance requirement)
- Correia v. McDonald, 25 Vet. App. 158 (Vet. App.) (requirements for testing passive and weight-bearing motion in musculoskeletal exams)
- DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 202 (Vet. App.) (consideration of functional loss due to pain)
- Thun v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 111 (Vet. App.) (framework for extraschedular referral)
- Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir.) (extraschedular referral for combined effects)
- Lewis v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 259 (Vet. App.) (definition of ankylosis)
