History
  • No items yet
midpage
09-08 630
09-08 630
| Board of Vet. App. | Aug 31, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served active duty Oct 1966–Oct 1968; appeal from Roanoke RO rating decisions (Oct 2008 denying hypertension; Aug 2009 denying TDIU).
  • Veteran has multiple service-connected disabilities (notably peripheral neuropathy of both lower extremities, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, PTSD, kidney disease) with a combined rating ≥70% throughout the appeal period.
  • EMG/NCS of Nov 15, 2010, showed severe peripheral neuropathy; VA increased each lower-extremity neuropathy to 40% effective Nov 15, 2010.
  • Veteran stopped working in 1989 (prior work in construction/welding); limited education (high school); reports use of cane/wheelchair and inability to walk long distances.
  • VA examinations (Feb 2011 and Oct 2013) provided differing views on functional limitations; 2013 examiner noted limits on prolonged standing/walking and addressed hypertension relationship to diabetes.
  • Board resolved reasonable doubt in Veteran’s favor and granted TDIU from Nov 15, 2010; remanded hypertension and TDIU prior-to-Nov-15-2010 issues for further development (addendum opinions).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Entitlement to service connection for hypertension Hypertension is related to or aggravated by service-connected conditions (e.g., diabetes, CAD) Prior VA opinions found no direct diabetic complication; relationship/aggravation not established REMANDED for addendum opinion addressing nexus and possible aggravation by service-connected conditions
Entitlement to TDIU prior to Nov 15, 2010 Veteran asserts unemployability since 1988/1989 due to fractures, chronic back disability, neuropathy, and other conditions VA examiners found service-connected conditions did not fully preclude all employment; non-service conditions contributed to unemployability REMANDED for a retrospective medical opinion describing functional limitations of service-connected disabilities and their impact on employability prior to Nov 15, 2010
Entitlement to TDIU from Nov 15, 2010 forward Veteran argues that severe lower-extremity neuropathy and other service-connected conditions prevented substantially gainful employment VA examiners gave mixed opinions; one said employment not wholly prevented, another documented severe neuropathy limiting standing/walking GRANTED — TDIU awarded from Nov 15, 2010, based on severe neuropathy limiting physical labor and the Veteran’s limited education/work history making sedentary work unrealistic

Key Cases Cited

  • Geib v. Shinseki, 733 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (ultimate TDIU determination is a legal/adjudicative finding, not a purely medical one)
  • Moore v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 356 (1991) (definition of substantially gainful employment and marginal employment)
  • Van Hoose v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 361 (1993) (unemployability inquiry focuses on ability to perform acts required by employment, not mere unemployment)
  • Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990) (reasonable doubt rule: resolve benefit-of-the-doubt in claimant’s favor)
  • Chotta v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 80 (2008) (retroactive medical opinions can be helpful for assessing past employability)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 09-08 630
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Aug 31, 2016
Docket Number: 09-08 630
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.