History
  • No items yet
midpage
07-03 631
07-03 631
| Board of Vet. App. | Feb 28, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served active duty 1996–2001 and sought a TDIU (total disability based on individual unemployability) rating.
  • Board inferred a TDIU issue in a January 2011 remand and adjudication followed; Board decisions in 2015 denied TDIU and were vacated/appealed for due process errors and remanded.
  • Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims granted a joint motion for remand in March 2016; Board remanded again in June 2016 for additional development.
  • In September 2016, the Appeals Management Center (AMC) granted TDIU effective September 21, 2009, resolving the remanded issue.
  • The Board determined the question of an effective date earlier than September 21, 2009 is a downstream issue that was not properly appealed and therefore is not before the Board.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Board has jurisdiction over TDIU effective date prior to Sept. 21, 2009 Veteran seeks earlier effective date for TDIU (appeal the start date) AMC award from Sept. 21, 2009 fully granted the remanded issue; earlier date was not appealed Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; earlier effective date is a downstream issue not perfected for appeal

Key Cases Cited

  • Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (an earlier effective date is a downstream issue that must be separately appealed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 07-03 631
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Feb 28, 2017
Docket Number: 07-03 631
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.