03-23 909
03-23 909
| Board of Vet. App. | Sep 18, 2017Background
- Veteran served on active duty from July 1964 to May 1969 and appealed a March 2003 VA Regional Office rating decision.
- Claim sought service connection for a skin disorder other than tinea cruris, to include chloracne and porphyria cutanea tarda, alleged secondary to herbicide exposure.
- The Board remanded the claim in January 2009 for further development.
- The Veteran died in June 2017 while the appeal was pending; the certificate of death was noted by the Board.
- The Board concluded that the appeal was moot because VA appellate claims do not survive the claimant’s death, and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
- The Board expressly preserved the possibility of substitution: an eligible person may request substitution (under 38 U.S.C. § 5121A and 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010) within one year of the Veteran’s death, with substitution requests for dismissed appeals to be filed with the Muskogee, OK Regional Office.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Veteran’s appeal for service connection survives his death | Veteran sought service connection for skin disorder (chloracne, porphyria) due to herbicide exposure | VA argued the Board lacks jurisdiction because the appellant died and VA appellate claims do not survive death | Appeal dismissed as moot for lack of jurisdiction; claims do not survive the appellant's death |
Key Cases Cited
- Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (holding that VA appellate claims generally do not survive the claimant’s death)
